Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Cureus ; 15(4): e37032, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2313162

ABSTRACT

Background The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, within two months of its detection, replaced the Delta variant to become the dominant circulating variant globally. Therefore, it is essential to understand the characteristics of the disease caused by the variant and its impact on vaccination. Methods A total of 165 confirmed Omicron cases attending a tertiary care hospital in Pune, Maharashtra, between December 2021 to February 2022 were studied. Their demographic, clinical, and immunization history was recorded. Results Among the 165 cases, 7.88% were B.1.1.529 Omicron cases, 25.45% were BA.1 Omicron cases, and 66.67% were BA.2 Omicron cases. Of these 165 patients, 146 (88.48%) were discharged after treatment, 12 (7.27%) died during hospitalization, and seven (4.24%) were brought dead. The presence of one or more comorbid conditions was seen in 15.15%, of which diabetes mellitus and hypertension (28% each) were the most common conditions. Older age (greater than 60 years), an important risk factor for poor outcomes, was present in 9.1% of cases. Among the 165 cases, vaccination with at least one dose of vaccine was found in 80.61% of cases. Out of 165 cases, clinical data was available for 158 cases. Of these 158 cases, 86.71% had symptoms, and 13.29% were asymptomatic. Fever, followed by cough, myalgia, runny nose, and headache, were the most common presenting symptoms. The mean duration of illness was 2.69 days, with 91.14% of cases having the illness for less than five days, and 89.24% of cases had a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of 1-4, suggesting a good prognosis. In 93.90% of cases, the chest X-ray findings were normal. Of the 158 cases, 92.41% of cases recovered with supportive treatment, and only 7.59% of cases required oxygen therapy. Conclusion The current study shows that the Omicron variant caused mild disease with reduced need for hospital admission and oxygen therapy in India.

2.
Pan African Medical Journal ; 37(Supplement 1) (no pagination), 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2231472

ABSTRACT

Introduction: as the epidemiological trend of COVID-19 infection continue to evolve with increasing prevalence and incidence globally, management of cases in low-resource health care settings require basic detailed clinical and laboratory characteristics. This study retrospectively described the clinical and laboratory characteristics of confirmed COVID-19 cases admitted into the isolation centre of ATBUTH, Bauchi. Method(s): clinical and laboratory data of 84 confirmed COVID-19 cases admitted into the isolation centre of ATBUTH, Bauchi according to NCDC guidelines were used. Diagnosis was based on nasal and nasopharyngeal swab positive result of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) result. Data extracted includes demographic, clinical presentations and laboratory characteristics. Result(s): the 84 COVID-19 patients comprised of 72% (59) males and 28% (25) females with mean age of 41.0+/-10.5 years, majority of the patients were within age-group 21-40 years. Forty-one percent presented with mild to moderate symptoms, 3.6% (3) presented with severe symptoms while 58.3% (49) were asymptomatic with mean body temperature of 36.60C +/- Sa. The common clinical manifestations were fever 23.4% (19) and cough 20.7% (17). About 29.3% of the patients had comorbidities, 17.1% (14) were hypertensive while 12.2% of the diabetic. Thirty percent (10) of the patients with DM required intensive care unit (ICU) admission with 10% mortality. Biochemical parameters were within normal range for all the patients. However, haematological parameters showed increased neutrophil (10, 43.5%) and lymphocyte count (19 (59.4%). Conclusion(s): the study findings revealed high number of asymptomatic cases, similarity in clinical manifestation and relatively normal laboratory characteristics. More experience with increase in number of patients may provide additional information. Interrupting community transmission will require early detection and contact trace of asymptomatic cases. Copyright © 2020, African Field Epidemiology Network. All rights reserved.

3.
Pathobiology ; : 1-10, 2023 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2223891

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to analyze the clinical features and laboratory markers of patients with Delta variant SARS-CoV-2 and explore the role of platelet in predicting the severity of Delta. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study was conducted on 863 patients laboratory-confirmed Delta variant SARS-CoV-2. These cases were sub-classified based on disease severity into mild (n = 304), moderate (n = 537), and severe (n = 22). A series of laboratory findings and clinical data were collected and analyzed during hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 863 hospitalized patients with Delta, the median age was 38 years (interquartile range, 30-51 years) and 471 (54.58%) were male. The most common clinical symptoms mainly included cough, fever, pharyngalgia, expectoration, dyspnea, fatigue, and headache, and the commonest comorbidities were hypertension and diabetes. Among the hematological variables, neutrophil count, red blood cell count, and hemoglobin, were found to be statistically significant with regard to subcategories based of disease severity (p < 0.05). Among coagulation parameters, there was a statistically significant difference in D-dimer, fibrinogen, international normalized ratio, and prothrombin time (p < 0.05). Statistically significant differences were observed in platelet markers including platelet count, large platelet count, and plateletcrit (p < 0.05). Additionally, there was strong correlation between platelet and other parameters with disease severity. Logistical regression analysis and ROC curves showed that D-dimer was a single best marker of disease severity (p = 0.005, p < 0.0001); however, platelet (p = 0.009, p = 0.002) and plateletcrit (p = 0.002, p = 0.001) could also predict severe disease. Platelet was identified as an independent risk factor for severe Delta. CONCLUSION: Low platelet may be a marker of disease severity in Delta variant SARS-CoV-2 and may contribute to determine the severity of patients infected with Delta.

4.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 105: 108542, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1638183

ABSTRACT

It remains important to investigate the changing and impact of routine blood values (RBVs) in order to predict mortality and follow an appropriate treatment in COVID-19 patients. In the study, the importance of RBVs in the mortality of patients with COVID-19 was investigated. The changes in the biochemical, hematological, and immunological parameters of patients who recovered (n = 4364) and died (n = 233) from COVID-19 over time and their relationship with the mortality of the disease were evaluated retrospectively. Odds ratios of the parameters affecting one-month mortality were calculated by running multiple-logistic-regression analysis. The cut off values and diagnostic efficiencies of the parameters that posed a risk for mortality were obtained via receiver operating curve analysis. It was determined that the C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, procalcitonin, erythrocyte-sedimentation-rate (ESR), troponin values were at abnormal levels until death occurred in the patients who died. In addition, the procalcitonin levels were consistently high in patients who died. The patients who died generally had a sustained increase in their leukocyte and neutrophil levels and biochemical variables, and an ongoing decrease in lymphopenia and eosinopenia levels. Although significant changes were observed in liver function tests, cardiac troponin, hemogram values, kidney function tests and parameters related to inflammation in deceased patients, high ESR, international-normalized-ratio (INR), prothrombin-time (PT), CRP, D-dimer, ferritin and red-cell-distribution width (RDW) values, respectively, were the most effective predictive mortality risk biomarkers of COVID-19. In addition, neutrophilia, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, erythrocytopenia were other risk predictors of mortality. Indicators was found in this study can be successfully used to predict mortality from COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/mortality , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Sedimentation , C-Reactive Protein , COVID-19/immunology , Erythrocyte Indices , Female , Ferritins , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Procalcitonin , Retrospective Studies , Troponin
5.
Cureus ; 13(11): e19791, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1579886

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, risk stratification based on clinical presentation, co-morbid illness, and combined laboratory parameters is essential to provide an adequate, timely intervention based on an individual's conditions to prevent mortality among cases. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out from June to October 2020, including all reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive COVID-19 non-survivors and control group survivors randomly selected after age and sex matching. Clinical and demographic information was collected from the medical records. Categorical variables were expressed by frequency and percentage. To explore the risk factors associated with mortality, univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: All non-survivors (n = 100) and 100 survivors (out of 1,018) were analyzed. Male gender (67.4%) was the independent risk factor for COVID-19 infection. Advanced age group, diabetes, cardiovascular, neurological, and hypertensive co-morbidities were statistically associated with mortality. Cardiac arrest and acute kidney injury (AKI) were the most common complications. Mortality is significantly associated with lymphopenia and raised lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), as shown by higher odds. In addition, raised neutrophils, monocytes, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum creatinine, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) are also significantly associated with mortality. The most common causes of death were respiratory failure (84%) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (77%). Of the non-survivors, 92% received corticosteroids, 63% were on high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, 29% were mechanically ventilated, and 29% received tocilizumab. CONCLUSION: Serial monitoring of neutrophils, lymphocytes, D-dimer, procalcitonin, AST, LDH, CRP, IL-6, serum creatinine, and albumin might provide a reliable and convenient method for classifying and predicting the severity and outcomes of patients with COVID-19.

6.
Front Pediatr ; 9: 665377, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1463494

ABSTRACT

Objective: Aimed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics, clinical features, treatment, and short-term prognosis of COVID-19 in children. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted in 48 children with COVID-19 admitted to 12 hospitals in eight cities in Hunan province, China, from January 26, 2020 to June 30, 2020. Results: Of the 48 cases, Familial clusters were confirmed for 46 children (96%). 16 (33%) were imported from other provinces. There were 11 (23%) asymptomatic cases. only 2 cases (4%) were severe. The most common symptom was fever (n = 20, 42%). Other symptoms included cough (n = 19, 40%), fatigue (n = 8, 17%), and diarrhea (n = 5, 10%). In the early stage, the total peripheral blood leukocytes count increased in 3(6%) cases and the lymphocytes count decreased in 5 (10%) cases. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin were elevated respectively in 3 (6%) cases and 2 (4%) cases. There were abnormal chest CT changes in 22 (46%) children, including 15 (68%) with patchy ground glass opacity, 5 (22%) with consolidation, and 2 (10%) with mixed shadowing. In addition to supportive treatment, antiviral therapy was received by 41 (85%) children, 11 (23%) patients were treated with antibiotics, and 2 (4%) were treated with methylprednisolone and intravenous immunoglobulin. Compared to 2 weeks follow-up, one child developed low fever and headache during the 4 weeks follow-up, 3 (6%) children had runny noses, one of them got mild cough, and 4 (12%) children had elevated white blood cells and lymphocytes. However, LDH and CK increased at 2 weeks and 4 weeks follow-up. 2 weeks follow-up identified normal chest radiographs in 33 (69%) pediatric patients. RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 was negative in all follow-up patients at 2 and 4 weeks follow-up. All 48 pediatric patients were visited by calling after 1 year of discharge. Conclusions: Most cases of COVID-19 in children in Hunan province were asymptomatic, mild, or moderate. Close family contact was the main route of infection. It appeared that the younger the patient, the less obvious their symptoms. Epidemiological history, nucleic acid test, and chest imaging were important tools for diagnosis in children.

7.
Artif Intell Med ; 111: 101983, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1059759

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND: Corona virus (COVID) has rapidly gained a foothold and caused a global pandemic. Particularists try their best to tackle this global crisis. New challenges outlined from various medical perspectives may require a novel design solution. Asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers show different health conditions and no symptoms; hence, a differentiation process is required to avert the risk of chronic virus carriers. OBJECTIVES: Laboratory criteria and patient dataset are compulsory in constructing a new framework. Prioritisation is a popular topic and a complex issue for patients with COVID-19, especially for asymptomatic carriers due to multi-laboratory criteria, criterion importance and trade-off amongst these criteria. This study presents new integrated decision-making framework that handles the prioritisation of patients with COVID-19 and can detect the health conditions of asymptomatic carriers. METHODS: The methodology includes four phases. Firstly, eight important laboratory criteria are chosen using two feature selection approaches. Real and simulation datasets from various medical perspectives are integrated to produce a new dataset involving 56 patients with different health conditions and can be used to check asymptomatic cases that can be detected within the prioritisation configuration. The first phase aims to develop a new decision matrix depending on the intersection between 'multi-laboratory criteria' and 'COVID-19 patient list'. In the second phase, entropy is utilised to set the objective weight, and TOPSIS is adapted to prioritise patients in the third phase. Finally, objective validation is performed. RESULTS: The patients are prioritised based on the selected criteria in descending order of health situation starting from the worst to the best. The proposed framework can discriminate among mild, serious and critical conditions and put patients in a queue while considering asymptomatic carriers. Validation findings revealed that the patients are classified into four equal groups and showed significant differences in their scores, indicating the validity of ranking. CONCLUSIONS: This study implies and discusses the numerous benefits of the suggested framework in detecting/recognising the health condition of patients prior to discharge, supporting the hospitalisation characteristics, managing patient care and optimising clinical prediction rule.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/physiopathology , Carrier State/physiopathology , Decision Support Techniques , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors
8.
Pan Afr Med J ; 37(Suppl 1): 27, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1032966

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: as the epidemiological trend of COVID-19 infection continue to evolve with increasing prevalence and incidence globally, management of cases in low-resource health care settings require basic detailed clinical and laboratory characteristics. This study retrospectively described the clinical and laboratory characteristics of confirmed COVID-19 cases admitted into the isolation centre of ATBUTH, Bauchi. METHODS: clinical and laboratory data of 84 confirmed COVID-19 cases admitted into the isolation centre of ATBUTH, Bauchi according to NCDC guidelines were used. Diagnosis was based on nasal and nasopharyngeal swab positive result of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) result. Data extracted includes demographic, clinical presentations and laboratory characteristics. RESULTS: the 84 COVID-19 patients comprised of 72% (59) males and 28% (25) females with mean age of 41.0±10.5 years, majority of the patients were within age-group 21-40 years. Forty-one percent presented with mild to moderate symptoms, 3.6% (3) presented with severe symptoms while 58.3% (49) were asymptomatic with mean body temperature of 36.60C ± Sá. The common clinical manifestations were fever 23.4% (19) and cough 20.7% (17). About 29.3% of the patients had comorbidities, 17.1% (14) were hypertensive while 12.2% of the diabetic. Thirty percent (10) of the patients with DM required intensive care unit (ICU) admission with 10% mortality. Biochemical parameters were within normal range for all the patients. However, haematological parameters showed increased neutrophil (10, 43.5%) and lymphocyte count (19 (59.4%). CONCLUSION: the study findings revealed high number of asymptomatic cases, similarity in clinical manifestation and relatively normal laboratory characteristics. More experience with increase in number of patients may provide additional information. Interrupting community transmission will require early detection and contact trace of asymptomatic cases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Adult , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Female , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nigeria , Patient Isolation , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
9.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 302(3): 629-634, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-610534

ABSTRACT

KEY MESSAGE: Laboratory characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection did not differ between pregnant and non-pregnant women. A trend of lower lymphocyte count was observed in the pregnant women group PURPOSE: Laboratory abnormalities, which characterize SARS-CoV-2 infection have been identified, nevertheless, data concerning laboratory characteristics of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 are limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the laboratory characteristics of pregnant compared to non-pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 who were examined at the obstetric emergency room in a tertiary medical center between March and April 2020. Patients were compared with non-pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 matched by age, who were examined at the general emergency room during the study period. All patients were confirmed for SARS-CoV-2 on admission. Clinical characteristics and laboratory results were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Study group included 11 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2, who were compared to 25 non-pregnant controls. Respiratory complaints were the most frequent reason for emergency room visit, and were reported in 54.5% and 80.0% of the pregnant and control groups, respectively (p = 0.12). White blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, and liver enzymes counts were within the normal range in both groups. Lyphocytopenia was observed in 45.5% and 32% of the pregnant and control groups, respectively (p = 0.44). The relative lymphocyte count to WBC was significantly reduced in the pregnant group compared to the controls [13.6% (4.5-19.3) vs. 26.5% (15.7-29.9); p = 0.003]. C-reactive protein [20(5-41) vs. 14 (2-52) mg/dL; p = 0.81] levels were elevated in both groups but without significant difference between them. CONCLUSION: Laboratory characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection did not differ between pregnant and non-pregnant women, although a trend of lower lymphocyte count was observed in the pregnant women group.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Pregnant Women , Betacoronavirus , C-Reactive Protein , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Virol Sin ; 35(3): 305-310, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-88643

ABSTRACT

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic has become a major challenge to public health in China and other countries, considering its pathogenicity across all age groups. Pregnancy is a unique physiological condition, and is characterized by altered immunity and elevated hormone levels to actively tolerate the semi-allogeneic fetus, which undergoes a sudden and substantial fluctuation during the immediate postpartum period. Changes in clinical features, laboratory characteristics, and imaging features of pregnant women during the pre-partum and post-partum periods require further elucidation. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical features, laboratory characteristics, and imaging features of eight pregnant cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pre-partum and post-partum periods. Our results showed that four of the eight pregnant women were asymptomatic before delivery but became symptomatic post-partum. Correspondingly, white blood cell (WBC) counts increased and lymphocyte (LYMPH) counts decreased. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in the serum also increased to a higher level than those in general pregnancy. Therefore, it is imperative to closely monitor laboratory parameters including the WBC count, LYMPH count, and CRP, along with other imaging features in chest CT scans, to promptly prevent, diagnose, and treat a SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Adult , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Blood Cell Count , C-Reactive Protein , COVID-19 , China , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Immunity , Leukocyte Count , Lymphocytes , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL